The Case for Star Trek 7, aka: ‘Generations’

Why Star Trek: Generations is a Good Film

[*****RED ALERT!*****SPOILERS BELOW!*****]

Generations is a flawed, but ultimately worthy entry in the franchise because it accomplishes something rare in franchise films: it effectively moves the characters forward. Picard has a satisfactory plot arc that adds depth to his character, Data takes a step that he needed to make for a long time, and Kirk is given a fitting farewell. And in true Trek fashion, the characters grapple with a metaphysical question: what does it mean to have a fulfilling life?

The core of the film deals with Kirk and Picard having to deal with the impact their legacies have had on them as men. This goes right to the core of the franchise. The first time we see a Starfleet Captain in The Cage, they have had to grapple with the responsibility of starship command, and how it leaves them lonely, isolated, and without family. Both Kirk and Picard have had to sacrifice leading a satisfying personal life to living for the greater good.

This comes into shocking relief in the Nexus. People tend to forget this about Kirk’s character, but the original concept of him was a man who said, “I’ve already got a female to worry about; her name’s the Enterprise.” His dalliances were ultimately tinged with tragedy, because they either ended in death (Edith Keeler, Miramanee), separation (Carol Marcus, Ruth), insanity (Lenore, Janice Lester), or were undertaken as a means to an end (Shana, Kelinda). Kirk’s greatest desire is to have lived a life for himself, one in which he was free to be involved with a person he loved.

Fans are upset by the manner of Kirk’s death, but ultimately it serves as a fitting conclusion to his character arc, both in the film and in the franchise at large. In his last moments, he makes a conscious choice. He knowingly puts himself at risk by leaping onto the platform. And as the catwalk is about to give way, he opts to help others—a man and a race he has never met—instead of saving himself. No one was ever going to get the better of Kirk in the end, nor was he going to go quietly in his sleep. He ultimately died to save others.

Kirks weighty decisions reflect the crisis that Picard had been grappling with, both in the series and in the film. Picard could have been an eminent archaeologist and didn’t. He could have had a family and didn’t. And now, the knowledge that he was now the last in his line was weighing heavily on him. From burying friends to ignoring his own passions, the burden of command was no less cumbersome. And it is telling that he had a nearly identical fantasy to Kirk’s while in the Nexus.

Soran functions as one of the better villains in the franchise, because he embodies the fears of both Captains. Instead of bettering himself and the Galaxy, he decided to devote his energy to achieve the ultimate act of selfishness. He waxes poetic about how our time is limited. But his choices stand in complete philosophical opposition to the lives of Kirk and Picard.

Data is confronted with this problem in another way. He finally gets what he has been yearning for, and it turns out to be less ideal than he had hoped. His journey has brought him to a place where grief, guilt and loss can affect him. It stands in marvelous contrast, because in attaining everything he wanted, he is forced to grapple with the things that Kirk, Picard and Soran find refuge from in the Nexus.

A frequently leveled criticism is that the audience never meets the inhabitants of the Veridian system. Could they have been introduced in way that wouldn’t detract from the intense emotional arcs of the characters? If it had been a planet we knew, it would have felt like emotional pandering. And no one wants to watch another movie where Earth is threatened, again.

The action set piece of the film, namely the destruction and crash of the Enterprise exceeds most of the Trek films. It is a sequence borne of incredible craftsmanship, and is one of the more intense and harrowing moments in the series.

While the film has many elements that work very well, it does not rank as one of the best films in the franchise.

Ultimately Generations shares many similarities with The Search for Spock. Both feature the destruction of the Enterprise and the emotional travails of her Captain. But the underlying issue is that many of the plot points don’t really cohere properly. There’s a weakness to the overall structure in both, where the events don’t seem to flow as they should. Sequences of spectacle, comic relief, and moments of intimate agony are thrown together in ways that, at times, diminish the impact of those constituent scenes.

Nevertheless, Generations is possessed of satisfying character development and entertaining spectacle. Along with Star Trek III: The Search for Spock (more on this later), it effectively disproves the simplistic “even good, odd bad” formula that has dominated Trek discourse for too long.

=/= LT Jesse MacKinnon
Chief Helmsman & Ship’s Historian
USS Loma Prieta

Cinematic Space Battles in Star Trek

image
I went to see Star Trek: First Contact at least a dozen times in the theaters. Not so much because it is an awesome movie, but because of Starfleet’s desperate fight against the Borg at the beginning of the film. That hooked my adolescent brain in some primal way, and I’ve been fixated on them every since.
As I prepared to see Into Darkness for the first time, I had to ask, what makes a good space battle? But more importantly, what makes a good one in a Star Trek film? And where have they failed? For the sake of simplicity, this examination will be chronological.
The Motion Picture – While it is a special effects heavy film, there is no battle per se. While the movie is not without its faults, the fact that the Enterprise never fires a shot in anger is not one of its drawbacks. In the vein of classic Trek, the film is about exploration, and the wonder of outer space.
The Wrath of Khan – In more ways than one, this is the gold standard by which all other Trek battles have been judged. After the clunky special effects of the Original Series, this was Trek’s first real go at it.
To paraphrase a friend of mine, the actual choreography of a fight scene is meaningless without emotional content. Khan’s motivation is established in Space Seed and reiterated well in the film. Likewise, Kirk’s anxiety about his age and diminishing skills provide a gripping emotional backdrop.
The scenes themselves, while thrilling, remain true to Trek’s cerebral core. After the Enterprise is abandoned by the Reliant, Kirk reflects that, “The only reason we’re alive is that I knew something about these ships that he didn’t.” The duel in the nebula is solved through ingenuity, not brawn, when Spock notes that, “His pattern indicates two-dimensional thinking.” This final resolution to the conflict works because the characters still think their way out of the situation rather than fight.
The Search for Spock – While it has a mixed critical legacy, the film boasts some of the most impressive, universe expanding model work in the franchise. Spacedock, the Excelsior, and the Bird of Prey remain immutable staples of the franchise.
The escape from Spacedock remains one of the better sequences of the series. Kirk is powerfully driven to his goal, and Nimoy infuses the scene with a tension that eclipses everything else in the film.
Kirk’s battle with Kruge does everything it needs to do narratively. What it lacks in visceral thrills, it achieves what it needs to narratively.
The Voyage Home – This film definitively proves that Trek can exist without themes of warfare and violence. It’s not a mark against the other films that they include space battles. Still, it’s just as possible to make an effective entry in the franchise without it.
The Final Frontier – What fifth movie?
The Undiscovered Country – This is one of the best entries in the franchise. But the final battle is disappointing.
The stakes are as high as they’ve ever been. But the scene simply consists of the Enterprise receiving fire. The resolution is even more lackluster: one oblique line on another ship aside, there is nothing about the technological solution that is set up earlier in the film. The compelling villain is dispatched not because he is outfought or outthought, but just due to a few lines of technobabble.
Generations – See above.
First Contact – We have it in emotional stakes—Picard’s entire character arc leads to this moment. The characters are dreading another Wolf 359.
More than any other film before it, First Contact sets its stage large. Dozens of Federation ships, many of which we have not seen before. The Defiant, built to fight the Borg, actually fights the Borg. It verges on being visually overwhelming, but still remains small enough to be engaging.
What makes it unique is that the grand battle is that is serves as the Inciting Incident of the film. Rather than being the culmination of the conflict, it sets the Enterprise on its objective.
Insurrection – The emotional content of the film never comes together. The battle is concluded with a technological solution. It’s about as entertaining as watching a screen saver.
Nemesis – The worst of the worst. Nemesis is absolutely what you never want to see in Star Trek. After a tepid emotional backstory, the film devotes a third of its runtime to specks in a lava lamp shooting sparks at each other.
The one thing that I’ll give it is that after two movies of threatening “ramming speed” at the drop of a hat, they finally pull the trigger and have ships colliding.
Trek ‘09 – The opening sequence is phenomenal. The visuals are… I’m running out of synonyms for “great” at this point. And by the opening credits, there is hardly a dry eye in the audience.
To recap,
The Good:
• Emotional Resonance
• Thinking your way out of a fight
• New ships instead of reusing old models
The Bad:
• Technobabble Solutions
• Drawing the scene out too long
• Action for the sake of action
The Ugly:
• If you call ramming speed, you better make it happen, or I will make you wish that the Vulcan Death Grip was real.

=/= LT Jesse MacKinnon
Chief Helmsman & Ship’s Historian
USS Loma Prieta

Historical Analysis (2012.0731): The Cultural and Commercial Origins of Star Trek

The people who turned their television sets to NBC at 8:30pm on Thursday, September 8, 1966 were greeted with a show that flummoxed the critics, the censors, and even the network that was airing it. But the younger generation, coming of age in a time of cultural revolution, took this genre-defining television show to heart. While it conveyed messages that some of the old guard were unprepared for, it did not come to fruition in a cultural vacuum. Star Trek was the aesthetic product of a long literary tradition, other film and television, and of 1960s social politics—all reappropriated to send Captain Kirk and his crew where no man had gone before.

Star Trek’s distant ancestors arose with the adventure novel. Jonathan Swift’s Captain Gulliver traversed a decidedly fantasy world, populated with giants, homonculi and immortals. Political satire was the most important component of these tales, as the fantasy served as a direct metaphor for contemporaneous political events. Science Fiction took an important early turn with Jules Verne’s 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea, which cemented the role of naval parlance within Science Fiction. Indeed, later writers took direct inspiration from the iconography of the Nautilus, placing similar tales of adventure in outer space.

These literary trends were galvanized with the Golden Age of Science Fiction. Amongst these were colorful action-adventure stories of interstellar conflict, often directed at children. They were further distilled in 1941, when Wilson Tucker proposed “space opera” as the appropriate term for the “hacky, grinding, stinking, outworn, spaceship yarn.” Although the term was originally pejorative, it is now frequently used with nostalgic affection, applying to large scale space adventure stories.

During the 1940s some of the naive charm of literary space opera was lost as standards of writing rose. Plots became more complicated, and the trend shifted towards a more vivid and lush romanticism. Most notable were the works of A.E. van Vogt, a master of intricate, metaphysical space opera. His tales were populated with the monsters, time paradoxes and quasimessianic supermen which would later inform Star Trek. Yet van Vogt was hardly the sole influence from this period that Trek would later draw from. The canon of Robert Heinlein contrasted militaristic themes and a free sex attitude. And by the time Isaac Asimov wrote his Foundation series using the theme of the “Galactic Empire,” the impression of vast scale so important to space opera was no longer the sole prerogative of straightforward adventure stories; it could now be used in a more serious context.

As Science Fiction literature was experiencing its Renaissance, it found an explosion of creativity in the medium of film. At the apogee of this trend was Forbidden Planet, which served as the text that most directly influenced Star Trek. In this adaptation of Shakespeare’s The Tempest, a regimented, military space vessel filled with male crewmen visits a planet; they encounter an unstable scientist; the captain romances his daughter; and in the end the narrative communicates an existential lesson. The plot, mixing the tawdry and the potent, is very sophisticated for its time—astonishingly so for a film ostensibly designed for a juvenile audience.

Television’s contribution to the genre of science fiction was largely postponed until the beginning of the 1960s. What the small screen did offer were serials that parroted Flash Gordon and Buck Rogers. From Captain Video to Space Patrol, these kiddie serials were lacking in storytelling and character development. To be sure, the spirit of these entries in the genre continued with the collected works of Irwin Allen; yet they were eclipsed by a more mature piece of television programming.

American science fiction television changed forever in 1959. The Twilight Zone, the half-hour CBS series hosted by Rod Serling (with his trademark cigarette, thin black tie and rasping voice) was perhaps the most famous anthology series to ever grace television. Though most of the episodes were pure Fantasy, a number of them were science fiction, including the pilot episode “Where is Everybody?” Soon after, ABC premiered The Outer Limits, their hour long answer to the speculative fiction anthology format. Though leaning more towards the monster-movie end of the science fiction spectrum, the series was often innovative in both style and subject matter; indeed, many of its writers were literary science fiction professionals and expanded the conventions of the genre.

These circumstances led Desilu and NBC to investigate the possibility of a new series. The space opera serial was a proven television format, albeit for a younger audience; and the speculative fiction anthology had proven to be moderately successful at rival networks.  Therefore writer Gene Roddenberry’s pitch for Star Trek operated as a nexus between two successful genres: the iconography and conventions of the kiddie space shows, and the format of the anthology programs. The spaceship would travel to a new planet each week and find a different array of challenges.

Roddenberry had pitched his show as “Wagon Train to the Stars,” expounding on the dearth of Westerns currently enjoying wild success on television. These shows drew on a diverse literary tradition. The ideology they espoused had found perfect expression in Fredrick Jackson Turner’s Frontier thesis, which optimistically viewed society as an organism evolving inexorably from “simple” to “complex.” While this characterization is ultimately an inadequate representation of profound transformations, several of the important films of the Western genre—notably Howard Hawks’ Red River and George Stevens’ Shane—propagated an erroneous perception of land on the Frontier and its “evolving” use, namely in their presentation of it as an unspoiled wilderness.

This American folklore was concurrently being redeployed in American politics, this time to serve a moderately liberal agenda. In 1960, John F. Kennedy stated that “We stand on the edge of a New Frontier—the frontier of unfulfilled hopes and dreams, a frontier of unknown opportunities and beliefs in peril. Beyond that frontier are uncharted areas of science and space, unsolved problems of peace and war, unconquered problems of ignorance and prejudice, unanswered questions of poverty and surplus.” In the minds of its creators, Star Trek would represent the natural fulfillment of Kennedy’s promises centuries hence; what would be termed “The Final Frontier.”

Of course, NBC and Desilu remained for-profit corporations more interested in pleasing stockholders and advertisers than communicating any overtly political message. Yet Kennedy’s message was not a radical proposal; the “New Frontier” represented a moderate strain of American political thought. And with the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, progressive trends of inclusivity were codified in American law and began to work their way into the cultural mainstream. Therefore there was enough advertiser interest in a series that would cater to a broad audience, with special appeal to a youth demographic. And if the political talk remained coded and within the larger pluralist center, all the better.

~Lt(jg) Jesse MacKinnon
Helm Officer
USS Loma Prieta
Starfleet, Region 4